In reply to JLS:
> Curious if it was done on a 350m top-rope as it appears.
> I'd have though the potential danger due to rope stretch during a fall would be significant...
It would be on a normal climbing rope, or even a static/semi-static/LSK.
If was a single very long top rope with no Bear Grylls style camera trickery, my guess is that it would probably have been a dyneema yachting rope with some mechanism at the top to provide a dynamic belay for shock-absorption instead. (Possibly something quite technological, possibly more old-school along the lines of very skilful belaying using a fairly slick device and great care to ensure that there's never any significant slack.)
This is the kind of thing I'm thinking of - very strong and extremely un-stretchy. You'd be bonkers to use this to climb on normally, but it is sometimes used for film/TV stunts and the like: https://www.shopusa.marlowropes.com/en-us/d2-racing-dr